2011 Alzheimer’s Disease Facts and Figures

Sunday, March 27th, 2011

The Alzheimer’s Association USA released the following Alzheimer’s Disease Facts and Figures 2011.
Go to the link to access the following information:

• Overall number of Americans with Alzheimer’s disease nationally and for each state
• Proportion of women and men with Alzheimer’s and other dementias
• Estimates of lifetime risk for developing Alzheimer’s disease
• Number of family caregivers, hours of care provided, economic value of unpaid care nationally and for each state, and the impact of caregiving on caregivers
• Use and costs of health care, long-term care and hospice care for people with Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias
• Number of deaths due to Alzheimer’s disease nationally and for each state, and death rates by age


Alzheimer’s is the sixth-leading cause of death in United States and the only cause of death among the top 10 in the United States that cannot be prevented, cured or even slowed. Based on mortality data from 2000-2008, death rates have declined for most major diseases while deaths from Alzheimer’s disease have risen 66 percent during the same period.

The conclusions in this report reflect currently available data on Alzheimer’s disease. They are the interpretations of the Alzheimer’s Association.

Details are available in the website Alzheimer’s Association

DSM 5 Proposed Revisions for Delirium and Dementia

Monday, March 21st, 2011

The DSM-5 Task Force and Work Group members (American Psychiatric Association) are working to develop criteria for diagnoses that not only reflect new advances in the science and conceptualization of mental disorders, but also reflect the needs of our patients.

The Neurocognitive Disorders Work Group has been responsible for addressing these disorders. Among the Work Group’s proposals is the recommendation that the category be divided into three broad syndromes: Delirium, Major Neurocognitive Disorder, and Mild Neurocognitive Disorder. The Neurocognitive Disorders Work Group has posted the draft criteria for the Alzheimer Disease Subtype as an illustration of how they propose to organize other subtypes. They are inviting comment on the general approach. Work on other subtypes is currently in progress, and the Work Group is in consultation with various expert groups that work in those areas (e.g. vascular cognitive impairment and dementia, frontotemporal lobar degeneration, dementia with Lewy bodies, Huntington’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, traumatic brain injury, etc.).

While they welcome comments and suggestions on any and all aspects of the proposal, they are particularly interested in obtaining input regarding the following issues:

1) Removing the term “Dementia” and adding “Major Neurocognitive Disorders”,

2) Adding a category of “Mild Neurocognitive Disorders”,

3) Categorizing behavioral disturbances, particularly the syndromes of psychosis and depression, associated with Neurocognitive Disorders, and

4) Selecting specific domains as well as measures of severity of cognitive functional impairment

Please Click this link to DSM 5 Delirium, Dementia, Amnestic, and Other Cognitive Disorders

Mid to Late-life Cholesterol and Dementia

Monday, January 24th, 2011

The 32-year relationship between cholesterol and dementia from midlife to late life. Neurology. November 23, 2010 75:1862-1863
Authors: Mielke, Zandi, Shao, et al

Methods:
The Prospective Population Study of Women, consisting of 1,462 women without dementia aged 38–60 years, was initiated in 1968–1969 in Gothenburg, Sweden. Follow-ups were conducted in 1974–1975, 1980–1981, 1992–1993, and 2000–2001. All-cause dementia was diagnosed according to DSM-III-R criteria and AD according to National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke–Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Disorders Association criteria. Cox proportional hazards regression examined baseline, time-dependent, and change in cholesterol levels in relation to incident dementia and AD among all participants. Analyses were repeated among participants who survived to the age of 70 years or older and participated in the 2000–2001 examination.

Results:
Higher cholesterol level in 1968 was not associated with an increased risk of AD (highest vs lowest quartile: hazard ratio [HR] 2.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.94–8.43) among those who survived to and participated in the 2000–2001 examination. While there was no association between cholesterol level and dementia when considering all participants over 32 years, a time-dependent decrease in cholesterol over the follow-up was associated with an increased risk of dementia (HR 2.35, 95% CI 1.22–4.58).

Conclusion:

These data suggest that midlife cholesterol level is not associated with an increased risk of AD. However, there may be a slight risk among those surviving to an age at risk for dementia. Declining cholesterol levels from midlife to late life may better predict AD risk than levels obtained at one timepoint prior to dementia onset. Analytic strategies examining this and other risk factors across the lifespan may affect interpretation of results.

They pointed to animal and cell culture studies suggesting a causal link with high cholesterol leading to amyloid-beta deposition characteristic of Alzheimer’s disease. However, cholesterol declines in older age, “perhaps as a function of underlying subclinical pathology, sarcopenia, or change in appetite,” Haan explained. The study was also limited by loss of participants due to death or refusal, possible undiagnosed dementia, lack of genotyping for high-risk alleles, and unknown generalizability to men and populations outside of Sweden, the researchers noted.

Rivastigmine May Increase Mortality in Delirium among the Critically Ill

Sunday, November 28th, 2010

In the study “Effect of rivastigmine as an adjunct to usual care with haloperidol on duration of delirium and mortality in critically ill patients: a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial” , authors Maarten MJ, Roes, Honing et al concluded that Rivastigmine did not decrease duration of delirium and might have increased mortality.


The authors do not recommend use of rivastigmine to treat delirium in critically ill patients.

Delirium is frequently diagnosed in critically ill patients and is associated with adverse outcome. Impaired cholinergic neurotransmission seems to have an important role in the development of delirium. The study’s aim was to establish the effect of the cholinesterase inhibitor rivastigmine on the duration of delirium in critically ill.

Patients (aged ≥18 years) who were diagnosed with delirium were enrolled from six intensive care units in the Netherlands, and treated between November, 2008, and January, 2010. Patients were randomised (1:1 ratio) to receive an increasing dose of rivastigmine or placebo, starting at 0•75 mL (1•5 mg rivastigmine) twice daily and increasing in increments to 3 mL (6 mg rivastigmine) twice daily from day 10 onwards, as an adjunct to usual care based on haloperidol. The trial pharmacist generated the randomisation sequence by computer, and consecutively numbered bottles of the study drug according to this sequence to conceal allocation.

The primary outcome was the duration of delirium during hospital admission. Analysis was by intention to treat. Duration of delirium was censored for patients who died or were discharged from hospital while delirious. Patients, medical staff, and investigators were masked to treatment allocation. Members of the data safety and monitoring board (DSMB) were unmasked and did interim analyses every 3 months.

Findings
Although a sample size of 440 patients was planned, after inclusion of 104 patients with delirium who were eligible for the intention-to-treat analysis (n=54 on rivastigmine, n=50 on placebo), the DSMB recommended that the trial be halted because mortality in the rivastigmine group (n=12, 22%) was higher than in the placebo group (n=4, 8%; p=0•07). Median duration of delirium was longer in the rivastigmine group (5•0 days, IQR 2•7—14•2) than in the placebo group (3•0 days, IQR 1•0—9•3; p=0•06).

Interpretation
Rivastigmine did not decrease duration of delirium and might have increased mortality so we do not recommend use of rivastigmine to treat delirium in critically ill patients.

This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00704301.

Funding
ZonMw, the Netherlands Brain Foundation, and Novartis.

Source
The Lancet, Volume 376, Issue 9755, Pages 1829 - 1837, 27 November 2010

Folic Acid Does Not Prevent Memory Decline

Sunday, July 18th, 2010

The addition of folic acid to the list of vitamins and supplements for the prevention of memory decline is addressed in this meta-analysis. Wald et al conducted a meta-analysis of 9 randomized controlled trials on folic acid, with or without vitamin B and its effect on memory, speed of information processing, language and executive function (decision making). The median duration per study is 6 months and the median age of participants is 75 years.

The results showed no effect of folic acid in the prevention of cognitive decline (memory, speed of information processing, language and decision making) among individuals without preexisting dementia.

The pooled standardized mean difference
in cognitive function test scores was 0.01 (95% CI,
-0.08 to 0.10) after a median treatment of 6 months; an
increase of 1% of a standard deviation of a cognitive
function test score, with confidence intervals excluding
an improvement or a deterioration greater than 10% of 1
standard deviation.

Studies of longer duration are needed in order to address the role of folic acid in the prevention of cognitive decline.

Source: The American Journal of Medicine (2010) 123, 522-527

Coping With Dementia: Violence and Aggression

Sunday, May 16th, 2010

Tips from the Alzheimer’s Disease International website:

Violence and aggression

“Violence and aggression are caused by the illness.”

From time to time, the person may become angry, aggressive or violent. It is not a personal attack on you, but a part of their illness. There are many reasons why a person with dementia may feel angry. They may not like being helped with things they used to do on their own, or may simply be frustrated due to an inability to do things.
Angry Skull
These short-term changes happen for a variety of reasons such as the person’s sense of loss of social control and judgment, loss of the ability to express negative feelings safely, and loss of the ability to understand the actions and abilities of others. It is therefore worth finding and avoiding the causes of unwanted certain reactions.

If the person feels angry, aggressive or violent, keep calm and try not to show fear or alarm. Give them more space and try to draw their attention to a calming activity.

This is one of the most difficult things to cope with for a caregiver, and if violence occurs often, you will need to seek help. Talk to someone for support, and speak with your doctor about help with managing the person.

Coping with Dementia: Alcohol and Cigarette Smoking

Sunday, May 16th, 2010

Modified from Alzheimer’s International UK:

Alcohol and cigarettes

“Supervise drinking and smoking to make sure accidents don’t happen.”

There is no problem for a person with dementia drinking alcohol in moderation if their medication allows. However the person may forget they have just had a drink and so have another one. This cycle can lead to repetition with the person becoming drunk or unmanageable.

1. Do not buy or store alcohol at home.
- reduce the number of bottles of alcohol available in the drinks cabinet
- empty or dilute some of them.
2. Distract the person with another activity, so that they do not think about drinking.
3. Provide water, juice, light soda, and other healthy cool drinks.

Tobacco Smoking Elderly

Cigarettes introduce a greater danger because of the risk of fire and damage to health.
1. Do not buy or store cigarettes at home.
2. Always supervise the person when smoking
- but remember the dangers of second-hand and third hand smoke!!!
3. Discourage smoking altogether and enroll in a smoking cessation program
4. Make sure that the clothes they wear and the furniture in the house are fire-resistant.
5. Install a smoke alarm, which can alert you to any danger.

Preventing Alzheimer’s Part 2: The NIH Consensus 2010

Tuesday, May 4th, 2010

Part 2: Cognitive Engagement and Physical Activity

1. Cognitive Engagement.

Cognitive Training - modest benefits on cognitive functioning and a small but statistically significant effect on reducing the extent of age-related decline in cognitive function at a 5-year follow-up. Very small but statistically significant benefit on instrumental activities of daily living—for example, managing finances, managing medications, keeping house, and, in a subgroup analysis, benefit on driving performance in the elderly.

However, these results from a single trial must be replicated to confirm the benefits of cognitive engagement on preventing
cognitive decline over a longer time period and in study subjects with varying levels of baseline cognitive abilities before a firm recommendation can be made.

2. Physical Activity. Increased physical activity, including walking, may help maintain or improve cognitive function in normal adults.

Tai chi PGH Geriatric Clinic

Although encouraging, these data should be viewed as preliminary. Work is ongoing to further investigate the benefits of
physical activity.

Factors associated with decreased risk of Alzheimer’s disease and cognitive decline were cognitive engagement (as indicated by literacy and social enrichment), physical activities in later life, and a diet low in saturated fat and high in vegetable intake. Light to moderate alcohol intake
is reported to be associated with reduced risk of Alzheimer’s disease, but results are inconsistent for cognitive decline

Source: NIH State-of-the-Science Conference:
Preventing Alzheimer’s Disease and Cognitive Decline
April 26–28, 2010

Preventing Alzheimer’s Part 1: The NIH Consensus 2010

Tuesday, May 4th, 2010

Part 1: Supplements and Medicines for Alzheimer’s Prevention

Available scientific evidence is inadequate to conclude that any known preventive strategies are effective. This conclusion is based on a review of published literature of randomized, controlled trials (RCTs), the most rigorous, highest quality evidence.

Summary of Detailed Interventions:
1. Vitamins, Nutrients, and Dietary Supplements.
Vitamin E - no evidence that this factor altered the onset of the Alzheimer’s disease.

Gingko biloba - A recent, large long-term RCT showed no reduction in the incidence of Alzheimer’s disease, leading to the conclusion that there is not sufficient evidence to support the efficacy of gingko biloba.

2. Medications
Cholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine) - this class of drugs is not effective in preventing Alzheimer’s disease.

Anti-hypertensive medications - negative with insufficient evidence for protection against Alzheimer’s disease.

NSAIDs—rofecoxib, naproxen, and celecoxib—suggest an increased incidence of Alzheimer’s disease with treatment.

Conjugated equine estrogen, one combined with methyl progesterone - suggest an increased incidence of dementia (including Alzheimer’s disease) with treatment.

Together, these trials suggest that no known medication can be said to reliably delay the onset of Alzheimer’s disease.

Source: NIH State-of-the-Science Conference:
Preventing Alzheimer’s Disease and Cognitive Decline
April 26–28, 2010

Driving and Dementia

Monday, April 19th, 2010

The American Academy of Neurology has released a guideline on Driving among Patients with Dementia.

Concerned about the Driving Ability and Driving Safety of a patient, parent, friend or loved one?

Ask yourself the following questions.

QUESTIONNAIRE for FAMILY OR CAREGIVER :
1. How many times has the patient been stopped or ticketed for a traffic violation in the last three years? (0, 1, 2, 3, 4 or more)
2. How many accidents has the patient been in, or caused, within the last three years? (0, 1, 2, 3, 4 or more)
3. In how many accidents was the patient at fault in the last three years? (0, 1, 2, 3, 4 or more)
Use this scale to answer the following questions:
1 strongly disagree;2 disagree; 3 no opinion; 4 agree; 5 strongly agree.
1. I have concerns about the patient’s ability to drive safely.
2. Others have concerns about his/her ability to drive safely.
3. The patient has limited the amount of driving that he/she does.
4. He/she avoids driving at night.
5. He/she avoids driving in the rain.
6. He/she avoids driving in busy traffic.
7. The patient will drive faster than the speed limit if the patient thinks he/she won’t be caught.
8. The patient will run a red light if the patient thinks that he/she won’t be caught.
9. The patient will drive after drinking more alcohol than the patient
should.
10. When he/she gets angry with other drivers, the patient will honk the horn, gesture, or drive up too closely to them.
[caption id=”attachment_380″ align=”aligncenter” width=”300″ caption=”cartoon from telspatch.co.uk”]cartoon from telspatch.co.uk[/caption]
If you have numerous YES responses:
1. Seek help from the patient’s healthcare provider for an assessment of Dementia (neurologist, geriatrician).
2. Make sure the patient gets a vision and hearing check.
3. Review medications and drugs (including alcohol and sleeping pills) that may increase the risk of driving accidents.

Source: American Academy of Neurology Guidelines 2010
Published in: Neurology 74 April 20, 2010